Week 6: Course Project Milestone 3
Submit Assignment
- Due Sunday by 11:59pm
- Points 300
- Submitting a file upload
Course Project Milestone 3: Guidelines
Updated 9/2018
Purpose
To apply lessons in nursing history to living nurses contributing to nursing history through an interview and recording of historical information
Course Outcomes
The Course Project enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.
CO1. Incorporate appropriate historical perspectives into current professional nursing practice (PO2).
CO4. Compare current professional nursing practice roles with historical roles of the nurse (PO7).
Points
The entire project is worth 600 points. Milestone 3 is worth 300 points of this total.
Due Date
Submit your completed NR393 Milestone 3 by the end of Week 6 by 11:59 p.m. MT.
Requirements and Guidelines
If submission method is written (typed on the template), do the following.
- Carefully review these Milestone 3 Guidelines.
- The interview must take place in a face-to-face or phone conversation only. An e-mail interview or asking the nurse to complete a written or typed interview is not permitted.
- Download the required Milestone 3 Template (Links to an external site.) and save it to your computer with the file name: Your Last Name NR393 Milestone 3.docx.
- You are required to complete the form using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.). Click on the envelope at the top of the page.
- Carefully review the assigned areas for Milestone 3, and type directly on your saved Milestone 3 Template.
- Use your instructor’s feedback from Milestone 2 to revise your questions prior to the interview.
- Submit your completed Milestone 3 Template by Sunday at the end of Week 6.
If the submission method is audio or audio/video, please do the following.
- Carefully review the Milestone 3 Guidelines document. The recording should be approximately 8 to 12 minutes.
- The interview must take place in a face-to-face or phone conversation only. An e-mail interview or asking the nurse to complete a written or typed interview is not permitted.
- Edit the recording as needed prior to submission.
- The audio or AV file must be able to be submitted on the Week 6 Assignments page and downloaded by the instructor for scoring. If it cannot be attached or downloaded, you will need to submit your Milestone 3 by typing on the Milestone 3 Template.
- Instructors are not able to provide advice or technical support regarding recordings. Submission of a recording is not required.
- Use your instructor’s feedback from Milestone 2 to revise your questions prior to the interview.
- Submit your completed Milestone 3 by Sunday at end of Week 6.
Note: Only one Milestone 3 file is accepted. If you choose to use audio or AV, all parts of Milestone 3 must be on that recording. Do not submit additional files.
Academic Integrity Reminder
Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.
By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment. Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.
Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.
Note: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.
Rubric
NR393 Milestone 3 Rubric Sept 18
NR393 Milestone 3 Rubric Sept 18
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStudent Introduction and Statement of PurposeStudent states his or her own first and last name and clearly states the purpose of the interview.
|
30.0 pts
Student states his or her own first and last name and clearly states the purpose of the interview.
|
26.0 pts
Student states his or her own first or last name and clearly states the purpose of the interview.
|
24.0 pts
Student states his or her own first or last name, but statement and the purpose of the interview is unclear.
|
11.0 pts
Student omits entire name OR omits purpose.
|
0.0 pts
Student omits entire name AND omits purpose.
|
|
30.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNurse IntroductionNurse is introduced (or introduces self) stating first and last name, years as an RN, and practice areas during career.
|
30.0 pts
Nurse (person being interviewed) is introduced (or introduces self) stating first and last name, years as an RN, and practice areas during career.
|
26.0 pts
Omits one of the items from first column.
|
24.0 pts
Omits two of the items from first column.
|
11.0 pts
Omits three of the items from first column.
|
0.0 pts
Omits four or more of the items from first column.
|
|
30.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNurse States Verbal Permission for Interview and SubmissionNurse clearly states verbal permission for this interview and submission to faculty for scoring purposes.
|
30.0 pts
Interviewer documents that nurse clearly states verbal permission for this interview and submission to faculty for scoring purposes.
|
26.0 pts
Interviewer documents that nurse states verbal permission, but provides no detail about specifics, such as submission to faculty.
|
24.0 pts
Interviewer documents that nurse’s statement of permission for this interview and submission to faculty for scoring purposes is stated.
|
11.0 pts
Interviewer documents that nurse gave permission, but gives no details how this was conveyed.
|
0.0 pts
Interviewer doesn’t document that nurse gave permission.
|
|
30.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and RevisionsInterviewer asks primary questions in a well-organized manner using follow-up questions to elicit more details. Interviewer used instructor feedback from Milestone 2 to revise the quality of questions used in the interview.
|
75.0 pts
Interviewer asks primary questions in a well-organized manner using follow-up questions to elicit more details.
|
66.0 pts
Interviewer asks primary questions in a mostly organized manner using some follow-up questions to elicit more details.
|
60.0 pts
Interviewer asks primary questions in a poorly organized manner using few follow-up questions to elicit more details. Interviewer made poor revisions to the quality of question and/or did not use instructor feedback from Milestone 2.
|
29.0 pts
Interviewer asks primary questions in a poorly organized manner using few follow-up questions to elicit more details. Interviewer made poor revisions to the quality of question and/or did not use instructor feedback from Milestone 2.
|
0.0 pts
Interviewer asks questions that were not proposed in Milestone 2, ignoring and disregarding instructor feedback.
|
|
75.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponsiveness and GuidanceInterviewer is responsive to the comments by the nurse and seeks more detail as needed. Interviewer demonstrates great interest in the nurse’s story. Interviewer keeps nurse on topic and prevents rambling by returning to topic.
|
75.0 pts
Interviewer made excellent revisions to the quality of question by using instructor feedback from Milestone 2
|
66.0 pts
Interviewer made good revisions to the quality of question by using instructor feedback from Milestone
|
60.0 pts
Interviewer is somewhat responsive to the comments by the nurse occasionally seeking more detail, demonstrates fair interest to the nurse’s story, and occasionally keeps the nurse on topic.
|
29.0 pts
Interviewer is poorly responsive to the comments by the nurse by rarely seeking more detail, demonstrates little interest to the nurse’s story, and does not keep the nurse on topic.
|
0.0 pts
Interviewer shows indifference or incivility to the interviewee, or strays into topics that have no relevance to the assignment.
|
|
75.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGratitudeInterviewer makes a clear statement of gratitude for the nurse’s time and sharing of history. A simple thank you is not sufficient.
|
20.0 pts
Interviewer makes a clear statement of gratitude for the nurse’s time and sharing of history. A simple thank you is not sufficient.
|
18.0 pts
Interviewer makes a mostly clear statement of gratitude for the nurse’s time and sharing of history.
|
16.0 pts
Interviewer makes a somewhat clear statement of gratitude for the nurse’s time and sharing of history.
|
8.0 pts
Interviewer makes a statement of gratitude for the nurse’s time and sharing of history with poor clarity. A simple thank you may have been all that was stated.
|
0.0 pts
The interviewer makes no statement of gratitude, or fails to thank the interviewee.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLearningInterviewer clearly and thoroughly summarizes what was learned from the interview with this nurse.
|
20.0 pts
Interviewer clearly and thoroughly summarizes what was learned from the interview with this nurse.
|
18.0 pts
Interviewer summarizes what was learned from the interview with this nurse in a mostly clear and thorough manner.
|
16.0 pts
Interviewer summarizes what was learned from the interview with this nurse and was somewhat clear and thorough.
|
8.0 pts
Interviewer summarizes what was learned from the interview with this nurse in an unclear manner that lacks thoroughness.
|
0.0 pts
No summary was included.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecording or Transcript of Interview is EditedRecording or transcript is edited prior to submission to eliminate gaps and redundancies; eliminate excessive background noise; remove spelling or typographical errors; and create a clear picture of the nurse’s contribution to the nursing profession.
|
20.0 pts
Recording or transcript is edited prior to submission to eliminate gaps and redundancies; eliminate excessive background noise; remove spelling or typographical errors; and create a clear picture of the nurse’s contribution to the nursing profession.
|
18.0 pts
One item is omitted or not well done from first column
|
16.0 pts
Two items are omitted or not well done from first column.
|
8.0 pts
Three items are omitted or not well done from first column.
|
0.0 pts
Four or most of the items are omitted or not well done from first column.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTemplate Use
|
0.0 pts
0 points deducted
Correct Template Used.
|
0.0 pts
30 points (10%) deducted
Incorrect or NO template used results in a deduction of 30 points (10%).
|
|
0.0 pts
|
Total Points: 300.0
|
Next
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.