what screening tool used by an nurse practitioner to maintained health in a community individual or family

edit and proofread the application essay 1
September 28, 2021
in two paragraph 1
September 28, 2021
0

what screening tool used by an nurse practitioner to maintained health in a community individual or family

Team PowerPoint Presentation: Critical Review and Evaluation of Health Promotion Protocol/Practice

Goal:

To complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family or community health.

Your presentation should include the following:

1. Identify and select a screening tool
2. Research of ethical, economical and legal issues relative to the practice in relation to health promotion protocol/practice.
3. Provide recommendations.

Submission Instructions:

  • Presentation is original work and logically organized in current APA style including citation of references.
  • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
  • PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the tile slide and the reference slide.
  • The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
  • Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

null

Rubric

Presentation Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues/Problems _2286

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Distinguished

Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

blank

Edit ratingDelete rating

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Excellent

Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.

50391_2101

Edit ratingDelete rating

2.0 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

50391_1645

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.0 to >0 pts

Poor

Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 4.0 pts

—

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms _1934

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Distinguished

Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

_133

Edit ratingDelete rating

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Excellent

Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

50391_2765

Edit ratingDelete rating

2.0 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

50391_2295

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.0 to >0 pts

Poor

Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

_2659

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 4.0 pts

—

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates a Conceptual Understanding _8355

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Distinguished

Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

_9439

Edit ratingDelete rating

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Excellent

Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

50391_2559

Edit ratingDelete rating

2.0 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

50391_8924

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.0 to >0 pts

Poor

Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

_9051

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 4.0 pts

—

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature _1242

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Distinguished

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

_3392

Edit ratingDelete rating

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Excellent

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

50391_5952

Edit ratingDelete rating

2.0 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

50391_1094

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.0 to >0 pts

Poor

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

_6840

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 4.0 pts

—

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines _3811Includes speaker’s notes and the assigned number of slides.

view longer description

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Distinguished

Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

_8993

Edit ratingDelete rating

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Excellent

Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

50391_4906

Edit ratingDelete rating

2.0 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

50391_4916

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.0 to >0 pts

Poor

Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

_3820

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.