When presenting a plan for change in the workplace, you must first identify and substantiate a problem, which you accomplished in Weeks 1 & 2. Once you have identified a problem and substantiated the problem by analyzing peer-reviewed literature, you should address biases and/or counter arguments about the problem in your professional field or discipline.

This week, you will incorporate the practice piece of the SPL Model and add to your discussion by analyzing and evaluating additional peer-reviewed literature to address contradictions in the literature. BE SURE TO ADD ONTO THE ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK THAT YOU STARTED IN WEEK 2.

Locate a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed articles in your professional field or discipline that focus on the problem you identified in Week 1. Be sure to find articles published within the last 5 years.

Analyze and evaluate the articles by adding to the analytical framework you created in Week 2, noting different authors’ perspectives. Analyzing and evaluating authors’ differing perspectives, also called arguments, will provide you with a better understanding of the topic to advance your own points of view and advance your scholarly voice.

Write 2 paragraphs, 300 to 400 words each, discussing the similarities and differences between the authors’ perspectives on the identified problem in professional field or discipline. You may find it helpful to identify in the readings 2 main topics about the stated problem and use those topics as subheadings in your paper.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.