This is the pre writing for the paper. I also need you to help me finish the RA paper. Can you think what you gonna to write and write a outline plus the teacher’s requirement. Thank you. Also, please check the file that I uploaded.
Use your new prompt begin your RA prewriting this week.
The point of prewriting is to generate ideas and start planning your essay; there are several ways to prewrite and different methods have different benefits. Try the three prewriting strategies listed below, to see what method you like best; remember to focus your prewriting on the RA prompt you’ve written.
None of these texts is any “easier” than another text. They all have complex rhetorical situations that will take some work to break down and understand. So follow your heart! Pick the text that moves you in some way, that makes you feel something: curiosity? pleasure? anger? freaked out? warm fuzzies? frustration? *Please note that since Thoreau is widely taught in high school and there are a lot of (often bad) papers floating around on this book, I’ll be particularly concerned about the complexity and originality of essays written on this text.**Also note that though Austin won’t be assigned until Week 4, hers is a really interesting text that could make for a super interesting paper. I strongly recommend that everyone preview her book this week to see if you might be interested in writing about it.By the time you submit the first draft of the RA (beginning of Week 4), your choice should be settled.2) What kind of argument will you make? p. 192 in the AGWR gives a quick list of the types of arguments you can make in the RA. Let’s break these down a bit more.
Any of these types of arguments will work for the RA. As long as you’re connecting the meaning of the text with a larger context and/or the audience and/or the familiar conventions of the pastoral, you will be making a rhetorically-focused argument.NOTE: If your essay only focuses on what the text means, it will not answer the prompt correctly.3) What secondary sources will you use? Students often make the mistake of not looking for sources until the week before the final draft is due–sometimes a day or two before it’s due! By that time, it’s too late to give your secondary sources the thorough attention they need, to make sure they are integrated properly and productively in the essay. One of the benefits of looking at secondary sources early on is that they can inspire your ideas. Integrating sources is not just about “proving” your point. It’s about engaging in conversation with others about a shared topic.Luckily, you’re not on your own when it comes to finding sources. The first place to look for sources is our assigned essays.Re-skim these essays first, looking for the main ideas (and using our Metacognitive Tools for Critical Reading as needed). Ask yourself whether these essays are interested in the same ideas that you’re interested in. OR, see if they offer you any useful information that you can use to analyze your chosen text.The second place to look is our Nature Writing Bibliography. This is a large collection of scholarly essays about nature writing compiled for your benefit. Don’t get overwhelmed by the long list of potential sources–get a snack and dive in!Again, skim the essays to identify the main ideas, then see how relevant they are to what you’re interested in. The third place to look for secondary sources is, of course, the internet. Use the guidelines in Ch. 4 of the AGWR to help you evaluate the credibility and reliability of all sources you find online. Remember that you can’t cite Wikipedia. But you can start by going to the Wikipedia entry on your text and browsing the links at the bottom to see if there’s anything useful there.Try searching in Google Scholar (Links to an external site.) or JSTOR (Links to an external site.). Need help? Sign up for office hours and ask!You should have found ALL THREE of your required secondary sources by the beginning of Week 5.
To help you explore some possibilities for your Rhetorical Analysis and give you a place to begin drafting, write a prompt for yourself that applies the general requirements of the assignment to your particular interests.In one paragraph, write the following (1-3 sentences for each item):1) Begin by describing some specific, interesting aspects of nature writing or the pastoral that you want to learn more about/explore further in your RA. These aspects that you find interesting (or otherwise worthy of your attention) will offer some context for the arguments that you will ultimately make in the essay. Pick one (or more) of the following options:
2) Then, ask yourself some questions about the context you’ve just described–your RA thesis should ultimately address these questions. Based on what you’ve just written, what rhetorical aspects can you explore further? Your questions might consider any combination of rhetorical and generic elements: message, purpose, genre conventions, social/historical context, rhetor and/or audience. Your questions don’t have to cover everything, but they should focus on HOW one element affects another, not simply what they are.
3) Next, describe your own, individual purpose and goals for writing this Rhetorical Analysis essay. What do you want to understand better about nature writing or the pastoral by the time you finish writing this essay? What specific skills and knowledge do you want to practice or demonstrate in your RA? 4) Finally, list some requirements and advice for yourself to keep in mind as you write the RA. Draw on your own knowledge of your writing process and work habits and understanding of the assignment itself. What note-taking and drafting strategies do you want to employ? What potential problems do you anticipate and wish to avoid? What do you need to remind yourself to do?