KIT714 ICT Research Principles – Semester 1, 2017

What laws govern arbitration in the U.S.? In Russia?
September 8, 2020
applying stakeholder analysis
September 8, 2020

KIT714 ICT Research Principles – Semester 1, 2017

for this research plan i need topic of my research plan within two or three days. can you give me topic so i can show my topic to my teacher because students need to show their topic before writing research plan so teacher can write student’s topic in their note book.this is my major assignment from my unit i want HD score assignments and reference list and in citations are not included in the word count. please take care about this

KIT714 ICT Research Principles – Semester 1, 2017

Assignment 4: Research Plan                                                                                  

Type:                In-semester (Individual assignment)

Task Length:   Approximately 3,500 – 5,000 words

Weighting:      35% of total assessment for this unit. This assignment sheet details the requirements for the research plan document.

Due Date:        11:55pm, 12 May 2017

Submission:    Completed assignments need to be uploaded to MyLO by the due date.

Description:

This practical exercise will engage students in preparing a research plan document that details their plans for the conduct of their proposed research project. Each student will be required to complete the exercise and prepare a written report that displays their level of research understanding and competence in relation to their proposed research project.

Objectives of Assignment:

To   provide   an   opportunity   to   display   research   understanding,   skills   and competence to conduct ICT research;

To  directly  contribute  to  methodology  preparations  including  the  conduct  of primary research data collection and analysis;

Background:

One of the primary aims of any research should be to contribute in some way to the existing body of knowledge within the field of investigation. In preparing an approach to a research investigation it is important to thoroughly and critically review current knowledge, identify an area requiring further research and consider the most appropriate methods for collecting and analysing data that will enable research questions to be addressed. The research plan document provides a structure to consider these elements and to address the: What, Why, How, Where, When and Who (if appropriate) of the proposed research.

Requirements:

Students  are  required  to  prepare  a  research  plan  document.  The  research  plan document should be approximately 3,500 – 5,000 words in length, be word processed

and use references and citations based on the Harvard system.

1

The recommended structure for the research plan document is as follows:

Titl(approximately 10-20 words)

o The title may be a work-in-progress that is subsequently modified. However, it should convey the key elements of the proposed research.

Research Abstract (approximately 100 – 200 words)

o This  section  introduces  the  research  topic  and  briefly  summarises  the rationale and significance of the proposed research and outlines its aims, background, methodology and anticipated research contributions.

Research Aims: Objectives and Questions (approximately 500 – 1,000 words)

o This  section  should  clearly  articulate  the  specific  aims  of  the  proposed research in a manner that concisely describes what the proposed research intends to accomplish;

o The research objectives and research questions should be clearly presented; o If hypotheses are being utilised they should be presented in summary here and subsequently examined in more detail in the research methodology

section of the research plan document (see below).

Research Background and Significance (approximately 1,500 – 3,000 words)

o This section should present a review and critical appraisal of key literature relevant to th0e proposed research.

o The significance of the proposed research should be contextualised within the literature presented.

Research Methodology (approximately 1,500 – 2,500 words)

o This section should clearly present sub-sections addressing the

1:  Research Philosophy such as ontology (two types of ontology 1: objective, 2: subjective, choose one of them according to topic) and epistemology (two types of epistemology, 1: Positivist, 2: Interpretivist Choose one of them according to topic), choose one philosophy ontology or epistemology according to research topic

2: Research Strategy (ethnography, case study, action research and grounded theory) choose one strategy according to the research topic.

3: Research Design for the proposed research;

o The Research Design sub-section should explicitly detail the approach, tools and techniques that will be used to collect, collate, analyse, discuss and interpret (where appropriate) research data.

o This section should also indicate the status of any ethical issues/constraints relating to the conduct of the research

Time-line, Facilities, Budget (where appropriate)

o This section provides  an  overview  of  the  proposed  research  time-line; identifies any facilities/equipment required to successfully conduct the proposed research; and, details of any budget issues/constraints relating to the conduct of the research.

References

o This section provides a list of bibliographic references and other resources referenced in the research plan document. Reference list is not included in word count.

2

CRITERIA Outstanding(HD) Very good(DN) Good(CR) Adequate(PP) Poor(NN)
Justification of the research undertaken as evidenced by the literature (30%) Outstanding justification of the research undertaken through the literature that supports the need for the research and the approach that has been taken. Well-developed argument for the research undertaken through the literature and the approach that has been taken. An argument for the research undertaken with some supporting literature. An argument for the research undertaken with some supporting literature. Lack of justification for the research.
Rigour in Methodology and/or experimental design (35%) Outstanding choice and justification of research methodology/design; high degree of rigour displayed in the application of the methodology / design towards resolving the research question(s). Shows a high level of methodological / technical competence Well justified, appropriate research methodology/design; rigorous application of this methodology / design to the resolution of the research question(s). Shows a sound level of methodological / technical competence Well-developed research methodology/design; justification or application of the research methodology / design may have some weaknesses. Shows appropriate level of methodological/ technical competence Adequate research methodology/design; minor problems with the justification or application of the methodology / design. Shows some methodological / technical competence Lack of a viable or substantiated approach to research apparent in the thesis. Lacks methodological/ technical competence
Depth and interpretation of analysis of data or experiment (15%) Proposed analysis is insightful, using well-chosen methods. Proposed analysis is very well of formed and relevant to the research situation. Good consideration of topic and research question(s); well- developed considerations for the proposed analysis/experiment. Adequate consideration of the research question(s); proposed analysis is reasonable, but lacking in real insight. Insufficient or shallow analysis is proposed; lack of significant insight shown in research approach.
Findings/Results(10%) Outstanding research plan that displays potential for insight through richness of the presentation of research findings / significance of results, and would be of interest to the academic community. Significant presentation of findings that promote insightful and significance that will inform the academic community. Demonstrates a degree of understanding with the proposed presentation of findings that that shows insight in the field of inquiry. Reasonable degree of understanding that shows some insight in the field of inquiry; proposal lacks significant finding or results or lacks understanding of the significance. Lack of insight gained from the research plan; lack of understanding of knowledge available in the literature or lack of understanding of the results.
Communication inWriting (10%) An academically professionalformatted document using language that was appropriate for the audience. A professional formatted documentusing language that was appropriate for the audience. A document that was appropriatelyformat with language that required improvement to better suit the audience. A document that was appropriately format with language that required improvement to better suit the au

 

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH MY ONLINE PROFESSOR TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

get-your-custom-paper

The post KIT714 ICT Research Principles – Semester 1, 2017 appeared first on MY ONLINE PROFESSOR .

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.