Needs to be 300 words

With the understanding that relatively few factual events which end up in court are captured on video/audio (or observed by unbiased, credible, and completely consistent witnesses), what implications does this have for our judicial system? In other words, is it possible to balance the need for fair court processes with the realities of the way most criminal (or civil) events are observed and reported? On one hand, are we comfortable with people being convicted of crimes (or held civilly liable for their actions) on the testimony of imperfect lay witnesses? On the other hand, are we comfortable with allowing crimes (or civil wrongs) to go unpunished if witnesses have something less than a perfect memory or understanding of the facts? How does this make you feel about the justice system as a whole?

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.