This journal is relatively open to how you would like to respond to the readings on just war, pacifism, and military spending. A couple suggested possibilities (but you can go in your own direction): (At least 500 words)
Is pacifism a hopeless pipe-dream, or could it be a realistic response even to the Islamic State and terrorism more generally?
Do you prefer pacifism, just war, or “total war” (i.e., no restraints on war other than the imperative to win), and why?
Does the Black Lives Matter platform make a convincing case for reducing military expenditures?
You may have other questions that struck you during the readings or other topics you would rather write about, which is also fine.
the Readings:
1. just war.
https://policy.m4bl.org/invest-divest/
2.pacifism.
http://www.uscatholic.org/articles/201702/mennonite-catholic-who-puts-pacifism-action-30921
3. military spending.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH MY ONLINE PROFESSOR TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
The post Does the Black Lives Matter platform make a convincing case for reducing military expenditures? appeared first on MY ONLINE PROFESSOR .