chapter 1 discussion question 1

updating overriding older functions with virtual validating property sets and communicating issues with feedback
October 22, 2021
week 6 program sumary paper
October 22, 2021

chapter 1 discussion question 1

Discussion Points are awarded for comments that · reflect that you have read the required text and readings · that you have prepared the discussion questions in advance · that you have thought about the content · that you have attempted to understand the readings · and that you are able to apply the content to “real life.” In other words, quality comments reflect effort, accuracy, and thoroughness. If you do not understand the material, you can still earn participation points by demonstrating that you have made an effort to understand the material and that you have read the text. Trying to struggle with and figure out the information merits points. I expect you to make posts that directly address all parts of the discussion questions as well as respond to others’ postings. Points awarded for responses to others’ postings will be awarded using the same criteria as original posts (see above, see syllabus).

You will not earn points for posts/replies that do not meet the above criteria or for posts/replies that simply reflect information from your personal life without incorporating specific concepts and understanding of the chapter.

Your reply should focus on enhancing your peer’s discussion and not on the organization or if you enjoyed reading it. This can be mentioned but should not be the focus. Further, you will not earn points by simply stating that you agree or disagree with a classmate without fully supporting your opinion with concepts from the course material. Your peer response must enhance your peer’s post while incorporating concepts from the course material directly related to the discussion question.

Required: Two posts per chapter. Original posts must be a minimum of 400 words combined. (approx 200 words each).

Required: Two responses to peers’ posts per chapter. Peer responses must be a minimum of 125-150 words for each peer response.

Select two of the topics below to discuss. Inside your discussion always start by titling your post in bold using one of the topic titles below and then discuss your topic starting on the next line. You will then reply to two of your peers’ posts from either the same or different topic. On the top line of your peer responses write “reply to:” and then the title of the peers’ post to which you are responding. Start your peer response on the next line.

Select 2 of the 3 following topics to cover in your discussion

Discussion A) Professional specialties in psychology

• In what ways are the four professional specialties in psychology similar and in what ways are they different.

Discussion B) Early Perspectives in psychology

• Compare and contrast early perspectives in psychology. (similarities and differences)

Discussion C) Women pioneers of psychology

•Read Figure 1.2 regarding women pioneers in the history of psychology. Select 2 of these contributors and read the links provided below and briefly review information regarding these women that you found interesting.

•M. Calkins: http://www.feministvoices.com/mary-whiton-calkins/ (Links to an external site.)

•M. Washburn:http (Links to an external site.)://www.feministvoices.com/margaret-floy-washburn (Links to an external site.)

•L. Hollingworth: http://www.feministvoices.com/leta-hollingworth/

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.