fwd discussion 12 300 words all instructions are attached

April 4, 2023

complete short psych sociology worksheet

April 4, 2023

assignment 1 practicum experience journal entry

To follow up on this courseâ€™s Practicum Experience, address the following in your Practicum Reflective Journal:

Select and describe a nursing theory that was used to guide your practice.
What goals and objectives were used for your Practicum Experience in this course? When developing your goals and objectives, were the seven domains of practice in mind?
Were you able to meet the timeline of practicum activities that you set at the beginning of the course in your initial journal based on your practicum requirements? If not, why and how do you plan to meet them in your next practicum experience?

By Day 7

Submit your Reflective Journal.by day 7 of week 10.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the following naming convention: â€œWK11Assgn1+lastname+first initialâ€.
Click the Week 11 Assignment 1 link.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as â€œWK11Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)â€ and click Open. If you are submitting multiple files, repeat until all files are attached.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Name: NURS_6531_Week_10_Journal_Rubric

	Unsatisfactory	Developing	Proficient	Exceptional
Assimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection	0 (0%) – 30 (30%) Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments	31 (31%) – 39 (39%) Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Minimal connections made through explanations and/or examples.	40 (40%) – 49 (49%) Reflection demonstrates moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples.	50 (50%) – 50 (50%) Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples.
Assimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth	0 (0%) – 9 (9%) Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked.	10 (10%) – 19 (19%) Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of studentâ€™s current experience.	20 (20%) – 29 (29%) Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of studentâ€™s current experience.	30 (30%) – 30 (30%) Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.
Written Expression and Formatting	0 (0%) – 5 (5%) Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work.	6 (6%) – 10 (10%) Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.	11 (11%) – 14 (14%) Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.	15 (15%) – 15 (15%) Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.
APA	0 (0%) – 1 (1%) Contains > 5 APA errors	2 (2%) – 3 (3%) Contains 3-5 APA errors	4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 APA errors	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) No APA errors
Total Points: 100

Unsatisfactory

Developing

Proficient

Exceptional

Assimilation and Synthesis:

Content
Reflection

0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments

31 (31%) – 39 (39%)

Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Minimal connections made through explanations and/or examples.

40 (40%) – 49 (49%)

Reflection demonstrates moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples.

50 (50%) – 50 (50%)

Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples.

Assimilation and Synthesis:

Personal Growth

0 (0%) – 9 (9%)

Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked.

10 (10%) – 19 (19%)

Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of studentâ€™s current experience.

20 (20%) – 29 (29%)

Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of studentâ€™s current experience.

30 (30%) – 30 (30%)

Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.

Written Expression and Formatting

0 (0%) – 5 (5%)

Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work.

6 (6%) – 10 (10%)

Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

11 (11%) – 14 (14%)

Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

15 (15%) – 15 (15%)

Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.

APA

0 (0%) – 1 (1%)

Contains > 5 APA errors

2 (2%) – 3 (3%)

Contains 3-5 APA errors

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains 1-2 APA errors

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

No APA errors

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6531_Week_10_Journal_Rubric

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.